Wrike Has a Real API. Here's What We Build With It.

Wrike ships a documented REST API, plus native connectors to a handful of tools like Salesforce and Slack, that let you read and write projects, tasks, custom fields, and time entries from outside the product. We build directly against that API when a native connector covers the basics but not the specific logic your business actually needs.

What's Actually in the Wrike API

Wrike's API gives you access to the same objects you'd otherwise click through by hand: folders, projects, tasks, subtasks, custom fields, comments, time logs, and users. You authenticate with an API token or OAuth2, and from there you can create a project from a template, update a status, pull time entries, or react to a change through webhooks instead of polling.

Beyond the API itself, Wrike also ships native connectors to tools people search for by name: Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, HubSpot, and SharePoint all show up with real, if modest, search volume around connecting them to Wrike. Those connectors handle straightforward cases well, a notification when a task moves, a basic record link, but they generally weren't built with your specific field mappings or approval logic in mind.

That gap is where most of our Wrike work actually lives. A native Salesforce connector might tell you a Wrike task exists; it won't necessarily update the right opportunity stage, respect your team's custom fields, or run both directions at once. We build that logic directly against Wrike's API once the native connector's basic behavior isn't enough.

Where a Native Connector Stops Being Enough

A connector that just posts a Slack message when a task changes status is easy. A connector that has to decide which Salesforce opportunity a Wrike project actually belongs to, update it correctly, and handle the case where someone renames the project later, is a different problem entirely. That's custom logic, not configuration.

The same pattern shows up with Outlook and HubSpot: the native options move simple events in one direction. Two-way sync, conditional routing, or anything that has to reconcile data that changed in both places at once usually means building directly against the API instead of relying on the connector's default behavior.

What We Build on Top of the Wrike API

Two-way Salesforce sync

A status change in Wrike updates the matching Salesforce opportunity stage, and a stage change in Salesforce updates the Wrike project, instead of one direction working and the other needing someone to notice and fix it by hand.

Email-to-project intake

A request that lands in a shared inbox creates a correctly configured Wrike project automatically, right template, right owner, right custom fields, instead of someone forwarding the email and building the project themselves.

What's the native connector not quite covering?

Maybe Salesforce syncs one direction but not the other. Maybe a custom field never makes it across. Tell us where the gap sits and we'll scope what it takes to close it.

Let's talk

Hit a wall with Wrike's native connectors?

Tell us which system Wrike needs to talk to and what the built-in connector gets wrong or skips entirely. We'll scope the custom work against Wrike's API directly. And if the real bottleneck is somewhere else in the business entirely, we're just as interested in that.

Let's talk

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Wrike have a public API?+
Yes, a documented REST API covering projects, tasks, custom fields, comments, and time entries, along with webhooks so you can react to changes instead of polling for them.
What does Wrike connect to natively?+
Wrike ships native connectors for a handful of widely used tools, including Salesforce, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, HubSpot, and SharePoint. They cover common, simple triggers well; anything involving your own custom fields, approval rules, or two-way updates usually needs custom work on top.
Is there a Wrike MCP server for connecting AI tools?+
We're not aware of a widely documented official MCP server from Wrike as of this writing, though plenty of SaaS tools are adding them. Either way, Wrike's existing API is enough to build an MCP-compatible layer that lets an AI agent read or act on Wrike data if that's genuinely what your team needs.
Do I need a developer to use Wrike's API?+
For a single webhook or a basic automation, maybe not. For anything that has to run reliably over time, handle errors, and keep two systems in sync without someone checking on it, you want someone who's built that kind of thing before.
What's the difference between the Wrike API and Wrike's own automation engine?+
Wrike's automation engine runs rules entirely inside Wrike, triggered by and acting on Wrike's own data. The API is how something outside Wrike reads from or writes to it. You usually need both: native rules for what happens inside the tool, custom API work for everything that has to reach beyond it.

Let's talk

Tell us the one thing your team does manually that eats up time. We read every message and reply within a day.